17. Selection and evolution
A section of Biology, 9700
Listing 10 of 104 questions
9700_w05_qp_4
THEORY
2005
Paper 4, Variant 0
Spraying insecticide on the walls inside houses is the main method of controlling a species of Anopheles mosquito in rural India. A number of different insecticides have been used. Malathion was the main insecticide used for many years. In 2005 the newer insecticide, deltamethrin, was used instead and the use of malathion was discontinued. A laboratory study was carried out using mosquitoes collected from two sites in India. The percentage of mosquitoes killed by malathion and deltamethrin was estimated. The results of the study are shown in Table 4.1 Table 4.1 site year percentage of mosquitoes killed by malathion deltamethrin Jamnagar Bikaner With reference to Table 4.1, describe the difference in effectiveness of the two insecticides. The researchers concluded that at Jamnagar, the mosquitoes had evolved resistance to deltamethrin. Explain how the mosquitoes evolved resistance. Explain how the data in Table 4.1 show evidence that the use of malathion was discontinued after 2005. The resistance of mosquitoes to malathion was found to be due to a difference in the shape of one enzyme. Name the type of variation controlling malathion resistance in the mosquito population. Some students suggested that resistance to malathion could be due to a gene with two alleles. They proposed that the allele for resistance to malathion would be dominant to the allele for non-resistance. Using this assumption, the data in Table 4.1 can be used to calculate the frequency of resistant mosquitoes and the frequency of the allele for resistance in a mosquito population. Use the Hardy-Weinberg principle to calculate the frequency, p, of the allele for resistance in Jamnagar in 2005.
9700_w16_qp_41
THEORY
2016
Paper 4, Variant 1
Spraying insecticide on the walls inside houses is the main method of controlling a species of Anopheles mosquito in rural India. A number of different insecticides have been used. Malathion was the main insecticide used for many years. In 2005 the newer insecticide, deltamethrin, was used instead and the use of malathion was discontinued. A laboratory study was carried out using mosquitoes collected from two sites in India. The percentage of mosquitoes killed by malathion and deltamethrin was estimated. The results of the study are shown in Table 4.1 Table 4.1 site year percentage of mosquitoes killed by malathion deltamethrin Jamnagar Bikaner With reference to Table 4.1, describe the difference in effectiveness of the two insecticides. The researchers concluded that at Jamnagar, the mosquitoes had evolved resistance to deltamethrin. Explain how the mosquitoes evolved resistance. Explain how the data in Table 4.1 show evidence that the use of malathion was discontinued after 2005. The resistance of mosquitoes to malathion was found to be due to a difference in the shape of one enzyme. Name the type of variation controlling malathion resistance in the mosquito population. Some students suggested that resistance to malathion could be due to a gene with two alleles. They proposed that the allele for resistance to malathion would be dominant to the allele for non-resistance. Using this assumption, the data in Table 4.1 can be used to calculate the frequency of resistant mosquitoes and the frequency of the allele for resistance in a mosquito population. Use the Hardy-Weinberg principle to calculate the frequency, p, of the allele for resistance in Jamnagar in 2005.
9700_w16_qp_42
THEORY
2016
Paper 4, Variant 2
Meiosis is one process that contributes to genetic variation. State precisely the stage of meiosis where single chromosomes line up on the equator. Outline the events taking place during anaphase I of meiosis. Describe how crossing over during meiosis leads to genetic variation. Mutation also causes genetic variation. Some populations of water hemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus, have evolved herbicide resistance as a result of a mutation. This is a problem for farmers as water hemp grows in crop fields, lowering productivity. Two populations of water hemp were tested for resistance to the herbicide mesotrione. One was a population known to be resistant and the other was a test population, whose resistance was unknown. • Leaves were removed and immersed in a radioactively labelled solution of mesotrione. • The leaves absorbed some mesotrione and became radioactive. • Resistant leaves are able to degrade mesotrione by metabolism. • The time for 50% of absorbed mesotrione to degrade was calculated by measuring the radioactivity of the leaves. The results are shown in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 population of water hemp mean time for 50% of absorbed mesotrione to degrade / hours standard deviation test 27.5 4.75 control 10.1 2.34 Explain how the results in Table 3.1 show that the two populations differ in their resistance to mesotrione. Explain why this example of genetic variation is important for natural selection in water hemp populations. Farmers can send in a sample of leaves of water hemp from their fields to a laboratory to be tested for resistance to mesotrione or other herbicides. Suggest the benefit of this to a farmer. The null hypothesis states there is no significant difference between the mean times for 50% of absorbed mesotrione to degrade in the two populations. A t‑test can be carried out to compare these two means. The critical value for t at the p = 0.05 significance level is 2.23. Use the formula in to calculate the value of t. Show your working. t n s n s x x = + - e o Key x = mean s = standard deviation n1 = 6 (number of readings for test population) n2 = 6 (number of readings for control population) t = Use your calculated value of t to explain whether the null hypothesis should be accepted or rejected. accept or reject explanation
9700_w18_qp_41
THEORY
2018
Paper 4, Variant 1
Questions Discovered
104